Find your ideal daily protein, carbs, and fat intake — personalized for your body, activity level, and diet approach.
Your Macros
These macros follow a balanced split (30/40/30) — suitable for most people as a starting point. Adjust based on how you feel and your training response.
Macronutrients are the three main types of nutrients your body needs in large quantities for energy, growth, and bodily functions. Every calorie you eat comes from one of these three sources:
The ratio between these three macros — not just total calories — affects your body composition, energy levels, and how sustainable your diet feels long-term.
There is no universally "best" macro split. The right choice depends on your goals, preferences, and how your body responds. Here are the five approaches this calculator supports:
| Diet Type | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Balanced | 30% | 40% | 30% | General health, beginners, sustainable eating |
| Low Carb | 40% | 25% | 35% | Blood sugar management, reducing cravings |
| High Protein | 40% | 30% | 30% | Muscle building, strength athletes, satiety |
| Keto | 25% | 5% | 70% | Rapid fat adaptation, epilepsy management |
| Low Fat | 30% | 50% | 20% | Endurance athletes, high-volume eaters |
Start with Balanced if you're unsure — it provides adequate amounts of all macros without extreme restrictions. You can always adjust after 2–4 weeks based on how your body responds.
Protein requirements vary significantly based on activity level, goals, and body composition. Here are evidence-based ranges per kilogram of bodyweight:
| Goal | Protein (g/kg/day) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| General health | 1.2 – 1.6 | Sufficient for sedentary to moderately active adults |
| Muscle building | 1.6 – 2.2 | Optimal for resistance training and hypertrophy |
| Weight loss (preserving muscle) | 1.2 – 1.5 | Higher protein helps retain lean mass in a deficit |
| Endurance athletes | 1.2 – 1.4 | Supports recovery without excess calorie load |
If you're strength training while in a calorie deficit, aim for the higher end (1.6–2.2 g/kg). Spreading protein intake evenly across 3–4 meals maximizes muscle protein synthesis throughout the day.
Every macro split is a division problem. You start with a calorie number and decide how much of it arrives as protein, how much as fat, and how much as carbohydrate. Percentages make that look tidy. Grams are what you buy, weigh and eat.
Set them in that order: protein first, then a floor under fat, then carbs with whatever remains. Each step earns its place. Protein defends lean mass while you are eating less than you burn. Fat below a certain intake starts costing you elsewhere, and Whittaker and Wu's 2021 meta-analysis of intervention studies found low-fat diets lowered total testosterone in men by roughly 10 to 15%. Carbohydrate is the flexible one; the Institute of Medicine's 2005 DRI report sets its RDA at 130 g a day, a figure derived from what the brain burns.
Marta is 32, stands 168 cm and weighs 72 kg. She trains four days a week and wants to lose fat. Here is her target built from the bottom up, every term substituted.
That 26/44/30 lands close to the balanced preset in the table above, which is the useful part. Work upward from grams and a sensible ratio falls out on its own. Pick the ratio off a chart first and you can end up with a protein figure that has nothing to do with the body eating it.
Her 58 g of fat sits well above the floor. The Institute of Medicine's acceptable range for adults starts at 20% of calories, which on 1,746 kcal is 39 g. Dropping to that line buys back 171 kcal of carbohydrate, which is a defensible trade for a short block before a race. Living there for months while dieting is where the hormone and fat-soluble-vitamin arguments start to bite.
Scaling protein to scale weight breaks down at the top of the BMI range. Piotr is 45, 178 cm and 118 kg, a BMI of 37. At 1.6 g/kg he would be chasing 189 g of protein a day, and the mass driving that figure is mostly fat, which needs no protein to maintain. Scale to a reference weight instead: a BMI of 25 at 178 cm works out to 79 kg, and 1.6 g/kg of that is 126 g. Sixty-three grams a day less, with every kilogram of muscle he actually carries still covered. The protein calculator runs both versions side by side.
Targets in grams are only worth setting if food maps onto them. Here is one ordinary day built on Marta's numbers, with quantities as eaten.
| Meal | kcal | Protein | Carbs | Fat |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 g oats, 200 g 0% Greek yogurt, 100 g blueberries | 365 | 27 g | 54 g | 4 g |
| 130 g cooked chicken breast, 200 g cooked rice, 10 g olive oil, salad | 563 | 45 g | 56 g | 16 g |
| 150 g skyr, one apple, 8 g almonds | 216 | 20 g | 29 g | 4 g |
| 120 g salmon, 250 g potatoes, 15 g olive oil, green vegetables | 597 | 30 g | 47 g | 31 g |
| Day total | 1,741 | 122 g | 186 g | 55 g |
| Target | 1,746 | 115 g | 191 g | 58 g |
Seven grams of protein over, five grams of carbs under, three grams of fat under. No scale would register the difference. Landing within about 10 g of each target is the working standard, and chasing the last gram spends attention you will want for the next three weeks.
Notice where the protein comes from. Four items carry almost all of it: the yogurt, the chicken, the skyr and the salmon. Remove the chicken alone and the day falls 40 g short, with nothing in the rest of the menu big enough to cover it. Building each meal around a protein source and filling in afterwards is how the target gets hit without arithmetic at 9pm, and a list of high-protein foods worth keeping in the fridge does most of the work in advance.
Once protein is adequate, the rest of the split is largely a preference question. These three all run on Marta's 1,746 kcal, so the only thing changing between rows is where the calories sit.
| Split | Protein | Carbs | Fat | Who it suits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher-carb 25/50/25 | 109 g | 218 g | 48 g | Endurance training, high weekly training volume, anyone who likes large meals |
| Moderate 30/40/30 | 131 g | 175 g | 58 g | The default when nothing points elsewhere; mixed training, general health |
| Lower-carb 35/25/40 | 153 g | 109 g | 78 g | Strong appetite response to protein and fat; fewer, denser meals; desk-bound weeks |
Here is the part most macro calculators leave out. Sacks and colleagues (NEJM, 2009) randomised 811 overweight adults to four diets with different fat, protein and carbohydrate targets. At two years, every group had lost about 4 kg, and the variable that predicted loss was how many group sessions people attended. Which ratio you pick mostly decides how the diet feels day to day. Whether you keep eating it decides the result.
Every number this calculator produced is an estimate stacked on another estimate. Mifflin-St Jeor predicts your resting burn. The activity factor is a guess you made about your own week. The deficit assumes your logging is honest. Three or four weeks of real weight data outranks all of it.
Appetite suppression flips this whole problem around. On GLP-1 medication, total intake often lands well under target, and protein is usually the first thing to slide, because protein-dense foods are the ones that feel heaviest. The gram targets above do not change; hitting them takes more planning and more liquid protein. Our guides on protein intake on GLP-1 medication and protecting muscle during GLP-1 treatment cover the nutrition side. Anything to do with the medication itself belongs with your prescriber.